No
Means What?
by Sam Aurelius Milam III
I
spent several months pursuing 'M', who steadfastly refused my advances.
Then one night when she needed to "camp out" at my house, she voluntarily
vacated the bed provided for her in another room and climbed into mine
instead. It was an early lesson for me: sometimes no means
yes.
For
over a year I propositioned 'D'. Each time, she gracefully refused.
One day, quite suddenly, I decided that she wasn't ever going to cooperate,
and I gave up. Within a week, she came looking for me. Later,
I asked her why she had so suddenly changed her mind. She said, "I
noticed that you weren't there anymore, and I came looking to see what
had happened to you." Once again, no meant yes.
'LT'
loudly objected when I refused to swear fidelity exclusively to her.
She insisted that, lacking such a promise, she would refuse to continue
the relationship. However, the affair lasted for more than another
two years, and I was the one who had to end it. Without a doubt,
no meant yes.
'A'
was one of the ladies to whom 'LT' had objected, and made the same objection
as 'LT'. The affair lasted for several months beyond the objection.
No meant yes for a while at least, and certainly for long enough.
'K'
was a devout Christian, and had a theological basis for refusal.
Nevertheless, she eventually and voluntarily came visiting. Even
a religious no can mean yes.
'LA',
a born-again Christian, adamantly refused from the very beginning, but
was hopelessly persuadable. Throughout the relationship, her stout
refusal was a regular preliminary to agreement. The disparity between
what she said and what she did was astonishing. She was the most
remarkable example, in my experience, of no means yes.
Sometimes
no means no, but not always, and even the woman herself can't always tell
for sure. Actually,
women sometimes need a lot of help making up their minds, and many a conquest
has succeeded because a man was persistent. Men use persistence because
generations of ancestors have proven that it works. The fact is that
there's no reward like success.
Those
arrogant females who strut around and shriek "No means no!" don't have
anywhere near enough experience at courting women to know what they're
yapping about. Many of them are not interested in courting women
at all, and none of them have any sympathy for men who are. Rather,
their agenda is to use their sexuality to control men. The idiotic
notion that persistence is the same as "sexual harassment" is part of their
agenda. To their agenda, I say "No", and in this case no definitely
means no.![10x5 Page Background GIF Image](../../Images/10x5_Page_Background.gif)
Another
Media Blitzkrieg
by Sam Aurelius Milam III
During
the current “domestic violence” blitz, two assumptions are being treated
as if they were Holy Doctrine.
Assumption:
Government must act to end the widespread tolerance of domestic violence. Yet,
the USA is presumed to be a democracy. If domestic violence
is as widely tolerated as the alarmists claim, then whether it's right
or wrong is irrelevant; it's condoned by consensus. That is,
the people make these decisions and the government, rather than tampering
with the people's attitudes, minds its own business.
Assumption:
A man is always wrong to hit a woman. Somebody is wrong
when a man hits a woman, but it might not always be the man. Such
attacks don't always happen in a vacuum, and nobody seems brave enough
ask what provocation the women might be providing. I've noticed that
sometimes a woman will just keep pushing and pushing, without the vaguest
notion of how intolerable she is, until eventually the man just can't take
any more. To pretend that men are infinitely docile, and can be provoked
with impunity, is very stupid. I might sympathize with a woman the
first time, but after she knows a man's limit she should know when to stop.
Every
man has a limit.
The
Bottom Line: For decades, women have ignored our actual nature
and tried to mold us into their stupid feminist fantasy. However,
we can be pushed only so far, and when we push back we're bigger and stronger
than they are; the more they try to force us, the more they're going
to be hurt. Before they try to remedy our faults, which I admit are
many, they should spend a few more centuries giving some attention to their
own plentiful imperfections.![10x5 Page Background GIF Image](../../Images/10x5_Page_Background.gif)
Buck Hunter Shoots Off His Mouth
Dear Buck
What's demography?
— Student
Dear Student
A political system where the people have
the right to vote. |
Law, American Style
This excerpt from The
American Rifleman is reprinted with permission.
Jim
Dalton, 83, of Higbee, Missouri, was afraid that three men on his front
porch were going to rob him, so he locked the door. He was proven
correct when one of the men picked up an ax and started to hack his way
through the door. Dalton armed himself, and when the men ignored
his warnings and broke through the door, Dalton fired his shotgun, wounding
one and routing all three. "I wouldn't prosecute a man who was defending
his home from three ax-wielding hoodlums," said the local prosecutor.
(The Daily Tribune, Columbia, MO, 3/11/94)
|