Sex Police
Sam Aurelius Milam III
I've
noticed that there is a large number of females who are lamenting the awful
harm that was done to them by their past history of sexual "molestation".
I can't turn on the TV during the day without seeing some tear-streaked,
quivery-voiced "victim" trying to "prevent it from happening to someone
else." The goal, apparently, is to convince everybody that sexual
experience is the worst possible thing that could happen to an adolescent
female.
The
fact is that there isn't anything inherently harmful or evil in ordinary
sexual behavior, even sexual behavior involving adolescents.1
However, did any of these "victims" bother to wonder what actually caused
the alleged harm? Was it the natural, normal sex act, or was it the
furtive way in which it was done, the guilt that was explicitly associated
with it by the "predator", the ominous warnings (AKA sex education) in
school, the hiding it and the fear of getting caught, the horrified reactions
of the adults when they became aware of it, the resulting involvement of
intimidating government agencies and institutions, the predatory coverage
by the news media?
The
harm results not from sexual behavior by adolescents, but from the obnoxious
connotations attached to it and by the malicious response to it, when it
is discovered. The harm is largely the result of beliefs imposed
upon us all by people with a Christianoid2
mentality. They have defined for us, whether we like it or not, that
sexual behavior is evil. They have sought every possible permutation
of that behavior to condemn. Oh, how righteous they feel, doing it!
The only sexual variation that they will allow is between a man and his
own wife, with her on her back and him on top, face-to-face, for the specific
purpose of procreation only, and they had better not enjoy it!3
Once technological methods of procreation are perfected, and actual physical
contact between the parents is no longer necessary, even that exception
will be condemned.
Was
I unduly influenced by the "sexual revolution" of the 60s? Well,
there were some things about those events that turned out to be mistakes.
It happens, for example, that sex isn't free, after all.4
Neither is love. They actually turned out to not even be the same
thing. Darn! However, our errors in the 60s were not anywhere
near as harmful as the malicious, pernicious, never-ending, "Hell Fire
and Damnation" Christianoid denunciation for its own sake of any and all
possible sexual pleasure. If a young lady is old enough to be interested,
capable, and attractive to men, then she's old enough. Courts, old
maids, busybodies and Christianoids ought to mind their own business.
They're doing a lot more harm than the sex is.
Finally,
back to those recovered, converted, female Christianoid Seen-The-Light
zealots, the ones who are on Oprah trying to "prevent it from happening
to anybody else".5
Those women are directing their vengeance at the wrong targets. The
harm which they claim to have suffered wasn't caused by their male "molesters".
It was caused by the Christianoids and by their various lackeys and imitators.
Do we want to prevent sexual "molestation" of female adolescents?
Short of redesigning us by the use of genetic engineering, men's behavior
isn't going to change. The best alternative, therefore, is to revise
the definitions. Don't think of sex as evil. Think of it as
good. If it wasn't for Christianoid nonsense and the stinking Sex
Police mentality that has pervaded the land, much of what we view today
as molestation would, instead, be viewed as education or as recreation.![10x5 Page Background GIF Image](../../Images/10x5_Page_Background.gif)
|
^
|
Oops! There I go, off to
prison! |
|
^
|
Resembling a Christian. Having
the appearance of a Christian. |
|
^
|
Is it any surprise that it's called
the Missionary Position? |
|
^
|
The "L" in TANSTAAFL really stands
for lay, not lunch. |
|
^
|
And boosting the ratings while
they're at it. |
frontiersman@ida.net |
Frontiersman,
479 E. 700 N., Firth, Idaho 83236
Also see Pharos at http://www.ida.net/users/pharos/ |
May 2001
Page 1
|
|