|
|
|
I still hear people advocate that English ought to be the official language in this country. In order for that to happen, the official status of the language would have to be declared by the U.S. Congress. Whether or not the Congress has the constitutional authority to declare such an official status for the language is another question, and is probably irrelevant. The Congress will do whatever its members want it to do, regardless of any lack of constitutionality. My purpose here isn't to ask whether or not the Congress can make such a declaration. My purpose is to note the ominous consequences of such a declaration. If English is declared to be the official language, then it must also be specifically and unambiguously defined. Thus, not only must the Congress declare that English is the official language. It must also specify exactly what is and what isn't English. Otherwise, the official status will be unenforceable. How can people be required to use only English unless all grammar, punctuation, and vocabulary is precisely defined? That's a very dangerous power for a government to have. George Orwell reflected on it much more eloquently that I can. Read the excerpt, below, from Chapter V of 1984, by George Orwell. 1984: An Excerpt "How is the dictionary getting on?" said Winston, raising his voice to overcome the noise. "Slowly," said Syme. "I'm on the adjectives. It's fascinating." He had brightened up immediately at the mention of Newspeak. He pushed his pannikin aside, took up his hunk of bread in one delicate hand and his cheese in the other, and leaned across the table so as to be able to speak without shouting. "The Eleventh Edition is the definitive edition," he said. "We're getting the language into its final shape the shape it's going to have when nobody speaks anything else. When we've finished with it, people like you will have to learn it all over again. You think, I dare say, that our chief job is inventing new words. But not a bit of it! We're destroying words scores of them, hundreds of them, every day. We're cutting the language down to the bone. The Eleventh Edition won't contain a single word that will become obsolete before the year 2050." He bit hungrily into his bread and swallowed a couple of mouthfuls, then continued speaking, with a sort of pedant's passion. His thin dark face had become animated, his eyes had lost their mocking expression and grown almost dreamy. "It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn't only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other words? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take 'good,' for instance. If you have a word like 'good,' what need is there for a word like 'bad'? 'Ungood' will do just as well better, because it's an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of 'good,' For PayPal payments, use editor@frontiersman.my3website.net.
|
what sense is there in having a whole string
of vague useless words like 'excellent' and 'splendid' and all the rest
of them? 'Plusgood' covers the meaning, or 'doubleplusgood' if you
want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already,
but in the final version of Newspeak there'll be nothing else. In
the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only
six words in reality, only one word. Don't you see the beauty of
that, Winston? It was B.B.'s idea originally, of course," he added
as an afterthought.
A sort of vapid eagerness flitted across Winston's face at the mention of Big Brother. Nevertheless Syme immediately detected a certain lack of enthusiasm. "You haven't a real appreciation of Newspeak, Winston," he said almost sadly. "Even when you write it you're still thinking in Oldspeak. I've read some of those pieces that you write in the Times occasionally. They're good enough, but they're translations. In your heart you'd prefer to stick to Oldspeak, with all its vagueness and its useless shades of meaning. You don't grasp the beauty of the destruction of words. Do you know that Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year?" Winston did know that, of course. He smiled sympathetically he hoped, not trusting himself to speak. Syme bit off another fragment of the dark-colored bread, chewed it briefly, and went on: "Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten. Already, in the Eleventh Edition, we're not far from that point. But the process will still be continuing long after you and I are dead. Every year fewer and fewer words, and the range of consciousness always a little smaller. Even now, of course, there's no reason or excuse for committing thoughtcrime. It's merely a question of self-discipline, reality-control. But in the end there won't be any need even for that. The Revolution will be complete when the language is perfect. Newspeak is Ingsoc and Ingsoc is Newspeak," he added with a sort of mystical satisfaction. "Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the year 2050, at the very latest, not a single human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now?" "Except " began Winston doubtfully, and them stopped. It had been on the tip of his tongue to say "Except the proles," but he checked himself, not feeling fully certain that this remark was not in some way unorthodox. Syme, however, had divined what he was about to say. "The proles are not human beings," he said carelessly. "By 2050 earlier, probably all real knowledge of Oldspeak will have disappeared. The whole literature of the past will have been destroyed. Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, Byron they'll exist only in Newspeak versions, not merely changed into something different, but actually changed into something contradictory of what they used to be. Even the literature of the Party will change. Even the slogans will change. How could you have a slogan like 'freedom is slavery' when the concept of freedom has been abolished? The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact there will be no thought, as we understand it now. Orthodoxy means not thinking not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." One of these days, thought Winston with sudden deep conviction, Syme will be vaporized. He is too intelligent. He sees too clearly and speaks too plainly. The Party does not like such people. One day he will disappear. It is written in his face. from 1984, Section One, Chapter V
by George Orwell Stray Thoughts Sam Aurelius Milam III Intelligence Test If the people of the Earth had used constructively the resources that theyve squandered on death and destruction then, by now, this planet would be a paradise. It Depends The pen might possibly be mightier than the sword but only if you can get people to read. For PayPal payments, use editor@frontiersman.my3website.net.
|
Letter to the Editor
Greetings! Quite an entertaining and informative issue! [May 2008 editor] In regard to sanitized portrayals of violence: [Exit Wound, May 2008 editor] Back in the mid sixties, Alfred Hitchcock directed a spy film called "Torn Curtain". The film contains a scene in which the hero and heroine (played respectively by Paul Newman and Julie Andrews) have to kill a spy in hand-to-hand combat. Neither character is a trained killer they are supposed to be ordinary people in an extreme situation. The sequence is played with great realism it's bloody, slow, clumsy, and rather repulsive. Critics were rather mixed in their reaction some liked the scene, some disliked it, but it stood out because it was so different from the highly stylized violence seen in the James Bond movies. Hitchcock didn't make it funny, like a scene from the Avengers. It was just a nasty event. "Torn Curtain" was not a big hit. There were other elements of the film that were flawed. Sir Donald the Elusive
Da Vinci Code Original Source Unknown. Forwarded by Marilyn B. Written across the wall of a cave were the following symbols: The president of the archaeological society pointed to the first drawing and said, "This is a woman. We can see that these people held women in high esteem. You can also tell that they were intelligent since the symbol of the donkey tells us that they were smart enough to have animals to help them till the soil. The next drawing is a shovel, which means that they also had tools to help them. Even further proof of their high intelligence is the fish. By that we know that if a famine hit the land then they could seek food from the ocean. The last symbol appears to be the Star of David. That tells us that they were probably Hebrews." The audience applauded enthusiastically. A little old Jewish man stood up in the back of the room and yelled, "Idiots! Hebrew is read from right to left! It says, 'Holy mackerel! Dig the ass on that chick!' " Warning Original Source Unknown. Forwarded by Millie, of Baltimore, Maryland. I haven't verified either the statistics or the arithmetic. editor
Doctors
The number of doctors in the U.S. is 700,000. The number of accidental deaths caused by doctors per year is 120,000. Thus, accidental deaths per doctor is 17.14%. Statistics attributed to
Guns
the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services The number of gun owners in the U.S. is 80,000,000. The number of accidental gun deaths per year, considering all age groups, is 1,500. Thus, the number of accidental deaths per gun owner is 0.001875%. Statistics attributed to the FBI
So statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners. Remember, guns don't kill people. Doctors do. Fact: Not everyone has a gun but almost everyone has at least one doctor. Please alert your friends to this alarming threat. We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand. Out of concern for the public at large, I have withheld statistics on lawyers for fear that the shock might cause people to panic and seek medical attention. For PayPal payments, use editor@frontiersman.my3website.net.
|
Acknowledgments My thanks to the following: SantaClara Bob; Lady Jan the Voluptuous; my mother; and Dewey and Betty. editor
Things About Cops Original Source Unknown. Forwarded by Don G.
Classes for Men Original Source Unknown. Forwarded by Don G.
Frontiersman Subscriptions and Back Issues Printed copies of this newsletter, either subscriptions or back issues, are available by application only. Cancellations If you don't want to keep receiving this newsletter, then print REFUSED, RETURN TO SENDER above your name and address and return the newsletter. When I receive it, I'll terminate your subscription. You can also cancel by letter, e-mail, carrier pigeon, or any other method that gets the message to me. Reprint Policy Permission is hereby granted to reproduce this newsletter in its entirety or to reproduce material from it, provided that the reproduction is accurate and that proper credit is given. Please note that I do not have the authority to give permission to reprint material that I have reprinted from other sources. For that permission, you must go to the original source. I would appreciate receiving a courtesy copy of any document or publication in which you reprint my material. Submissions I solicit letters, articles, and cartoons for the newsletter, but I don't pay for them. Short items are more likely to be printed. I suggest that letters and articles be shorter than 500 words but that's flexible depending on space available and the content of the piece. I give credit for all items printed unless the author specifies otherwise. Payment This newsletter isn't for sale. If you care to make a voluntary contribution, then I prefer cash, prepaid telephone cards, or U.S. postage stamps. For checks or money orders please inquire. For PayPal payments, use editor@frontiersman.my3website.net. The continued existence of the newsletter will depend, in part, on such contributions. I don't accept anything that requires me to provide ID to receive it. In case anybody's curious, I also accept gold, silver, platinum, etc. Sam Aurelius Milam III, editor
For PayPal payments, use editor@frontiersman.my3website.net.
|
|
|