the September
11 attacks, they seemed like they mostly just wanted to leave.
I never heard from them again. They didn't reply to any of my subsequent
correspondence. Maybe they disappeared at the hands of agents
of the Unnamed Agency.
I
occasionally notice my ideas being used by somebody else. If he (she,
in this case) actually took the idea from my work, then a reference to
me would be courteous. However, ideas, by their nature, are freely
available for anybody to discover or to use. Intellectual property
is a contradiction in terms.
All
of my essays about money, taxes, and corporations are available under that
heading, in Pharos. I've added several more essays under that
heading since I left California. Maybe you haven't read those subsequent
essays. It might be worthwhile for you to do so.
Regarding
the facts about the Fed, the issue isn't what people will do about them.
The issue is what you will do about them.
—editor
Dear Sam,
I
just got your June 2018 Frontiersman. As always, I enjoy reading
your thoughts. For starters, I totally loved your upside down flag,
nation in distress stamp. Not only an astute observation but a great
kick in the nuts to our "gov-mint". Ha ha. I totally dug it.
Now,
to your newsletter. Whoever the prisoner
was that said blah, blah, and ended up in the SHU, what an idiot.
I'm not saying he's all wrong. Of course you stand back to back with
a buddy in a bar fight. And prison is a violent place, SHU or
mainline, and sometimes, hole be damned, you have to hurt people, or be
hurt.
But
the guy who wrote you, describing injuries, etc., either he's a liar or
a dumbass who enjoys being in the mix. Instead of being a braggart,
its better to be quiet and carry a big stick. That way your enemies
never see it coming because you haven't ran your mouth too much and gave
up your game.
Anyway,
I don't want to waste ink on a j-cat. What you wrote, "Carnet:
Rise of the machines", I agree with your take on the issue. The idea
of your car locking you in and driving you to a police station in the event
of a warrant is a fucked up thought. And as for a former girlfriend
getting a restraining order, the problem could be larger than your car
restricting where you can drive. What if she wants to be a bitch
and follows you, your car would attempt to maintain the minimum distance
required between you and her, and since the car is in "code-mode", the
car couldn't relinquish control to you and she could drive "you" around
all night, and what would the car do if she drove you into a cul-de-sac?
Would it then deliver you to the cops, reporting a restraining order violation?
And
yes, what a creative way to kidnap, and also, one could send a car to pick
up the ransom to avoid contact. But think about this, what if the
government declared "marshal law", what an effective "crowd-control" measure,
to reprogram all autos and trucks, drones, etc. to run over anything
that has an ambient temperature between 97 to 100 degrees, or if the moving
object detected by the car wasn't transmitting a code recognized by the
government. Then all movement would be "dispatched" by the autonomous,
roving, computer guided, 4 wheeled army.
The
implications of privacy violations and crowd control are staggering.
One could write hundreds of Sci-fi novels based on this premise....
—a prisoner
Regarding
my Carnet article,
on pages 1 and 2 of the June issue, Carl, of Gramling, South Carolina,
found some related information in an article
on pages B1 and B2 of the June 14 Wall Street Journal. According
to that article, authorities in China are equipping cars with RFID chips,
soon to be mandatory, and installing RFID readers along the roads.
According to the article, the new devices will "vastly expand China's surveillance
network... [that] already includes widespread use of security cameras,
facial-recognition technology and internet monitoring.”
The
Wall Street Journal article neglected to mention the similarity of the
Chinese system to the vast and growing transportation-based surveillance
and control infrastructure in this country.
—editor
Stray Thoughts
Sam Aurelius Milam III
• I
seriously doubt if any so-called indigenous people, anywhere on the entire
planet, were originally native to the region in which they lived.
Instead, I suspect that, in every case and without exception, their ancestors
were foreign invaders who displaced previous so-called indigenous people.
• Democracy
isn't based on the notion that the majority knows best. Democracy
is based on the notion that the biggest army will probably win, and that
whichever side has the most votes would probably also have had the biggest
army. Thus, votes are substituted for bullets. The decisions
are still based on might, not on right, and it's still just as likely that
the wrong side will win.![10x5 Page Background GIF Image](../../Images/10x5_Page_Background.gif)
July 2018 |
Frontiersman,0c/o
4984 Peach Mountain Drive, Gainesville, Georgia 30507
http://frontiersman.org.uk/ |
Page
3 |
|