 
 Look!
Up In The Sky! It's a Bird! It's a Plane! It's Superperson! by Sam Aurelius Milam III
One
day while I was digging a hole in the ground (brawny, manly work!), and
pondering the problems of life, I came upon a sudden vision of the final
destiny of the feminist agenda. It may be that the thought was triggered
by the quantities of water involved in my excavation (I was working on
the sewer). In any case, I was pondering hurricanes. It was
in that meteorological context that I saw the light.
Consider
hurricanes. Prominent among feminist idiocy in recent years was the
rampage against lady's names for hurricanes. Eventually, the lovelies
prevailed, and hurricanes now bear names of either gender.
It
occurred to me, however, that we remain vulnerable to feminist idiocy.
The miracle is only that they haven't noticed. Right now, they're
probably too busy entrapping their male office-mates with provocative attire
and flirtatious behavior, then suing them for sexual misconduct.
Eventually, however, they'll notice. If we act now, maybe we can
avoid the inevitable confrontation.
In
keeping with their past moronic obsessions (chairperson, draftsperson,
and so forth), it's obvious that feminists have no regard for homonyms.
(Man — a male human vs man — the species homo sapiens). Maybe grammar
isn't their strong suit. Anyway, I believe it would be prudent of
us, while they're preoccupied baiting and jailing incautious men, to further
purify weather service terminology. After all, if they objected to
names of the feminine gender, they might resent what sounds like a pronoun
of the feminine gender. That is, what about hurricanes?
I suggest a new name: themicanes.
Of
course, even this won't be sufficient. With feminists, nothing ever
is. Having forsaken the designation
hurricane, and substituted
the imminently more suitable themicane, we have again (in typical
blundering male fashion) left ourselves vulnerable to henpecking, uh, fowlpecking.
For (sadly), it isn't possible to tell in advance which themicane will
be a disaster, and which will be relatively innocuous. This difficulty
of prediction (is that why we originally called them hericanes?)
leaves us vulnerable to a charge of sexual favoritism. What if (Goddess
forbid!) we should happen to use lady's names for the bad themicanes and
men's names for the mild themicanes? It's kind of random, but it
could happen. The selective perception of feminists being what it
is, I'd say they'll perceive that it's happened, weather it does or not.
What to do???
Don't
panic. The very character of the new designation (themicane) suggests
a solution. We simply use dual names. Thus we will talk of
themicane Harry and Sally, themicane Napoleon and Josephine, or even (dare
I?) themicane Sam and Reba. You get the idea. Surely, this
elaborate concession would satisfy even the most rabid feminist.
Ha! Even the least rabid feminist will quickly note the implicit
sexist bigotry inherent in the scheme. She will immediately leap
to the conclusion that the terminology was devised by a man. She
will instantly recognize that its purpose is to perpetuate the insidious
male domination of weather service terminology. Consider! Themicane
Napoleon and Josephine, but not themicane Josephine and Napoleon.
Themicane Sam and Wynonna, but never themicane Wynonna and Sam.
Aghast, wild-eyed feminists will run amuck. Using Playtext bras to
sling burning dictionaries, they'll storm the local TV stations, while
shrieking obscenities such as Men's Club, and
Women Need Not
Apply.
Enraged
women will demand, as the only possible remedy, an end of the use of male
names, demanding instead their obvious and Goddess given right of exclusive
access to the terminology. It will be necessary, indeed, it was inevitable
from the beginning, that there will be only female names: Themicane
Ann, Themicane Barbara, Themicane Caroline, Themicane Dorothy, ....
Of
course, with victory nearly complete, with total domination of weather
service terminology within sight, feminists will exhibit one final burst
of determination. What of the hint of male influence in the designation
them?
Wouldn't they feel safer with something more female? Finally, the
issue will be settled once and for all, weather we like it or not.
The feminists will be appeased one last time. We'll surrender the
final point, release the last hold on our masculine world, and allow the
ultimate change in the terminology. There will no longer be themicanes.
There will never be a
himicane. There will only be hericanes.  Tax Fraud by Sam Aurelius Milam III
Proposition
13 (California, 1978) restricted ad valorem property tax increases to 2
% per year. Predictably, the PIGS running the government are subverting
the restriction. Using my property tax bills as a source, here are
the increases after my bill for 1988-1989.
Tax Bill For: | Annual Increase inProperty Tax | Annual Increase
in Property Tax Bill | 1989-1990 | 1.6% | 10.8% | 1990-1991 | 2.0% | 10.5% | 1991-1992 | .7% | 1.1% | 1992-1993 | -2.0% | 19.0% | 1993-1994 | 3.6% | 12.7% | 1994-1995
| 2.8%
| 4.2%
| Total Increase | 8.9% | 72.7% |

The
so-called Direct Assessments, which account for most of the increase, are
not ad valorem taxes. Therefore, they're unregulated. My tax
bill says, "Payments made for less than the total installment due are not
acceptable. Any such partial payments received will be returned to
the taxpayer." Thus the entire bill, and not just the property tax,
is mandatory.
The
bill also says, "If the taxes are not paid ... the property becomes subject
to a power of sale by the County Tax Collector and will be sold at public
auction ...." This position of the tax collector is tantamount to
an open declaration of actual ownership of the property. The so-called
owner is actually only a renter. The so-called property tax is actually
a rent payment. If the payment isn't made, the real owner will evict
the so-called owner and find a new one.
If
you see any way to hurt these PIGS even a little, do it. Send any
bright ideas you have to the Frontiersman for publication. 
The only difference between taxation and
extortion is the excuse for doing it. |
Another Challenge
- Listerine has joined the long list of products that can no longer be
purchased in glass containers. With a vast supply of silicon on this
planet, a dwindling supply of petroleum, bulging land-fills, and a crying
need for jobs for unskilled people, the idiots in charge continue to sell
products in disposable plastic instead of in reusable glass. I suggest:
1. | | Buy
products in glass when you can. | 2. | | When
you can't buy in glass, don't put the empty plastic containers in your
own trash. Take them back to the store and put them in the store's
trash. If the store management objects, promise that you'll stop
doing it just as soon as they start selling those products in glass containers. |
|
|