|
|
|
![]()
Letters to the Editor Dear Sam, Greetings: ![]() Eric; Tehachapi, California
![]() 1. Rights are not religious. They are political. The concept of "Creator-given rights" inherently contradicts the doctrine of the separation of church and state. 2. In a culture in which murder was within people's ability, didn't require permission, and was generally or customarily approved or tolerated, murder would be a right. editor
![]() Dear Sam - 1. What are you trying to do? Completely revamp the whole
(100%) of the commercial marketplace? Do you know how much work
(energy) it would take (even with a Cray Computer) to daily determine how
many grams/oz of gold or silver it would take to "buy" a dozen eggs??
Personally, I agree with the concept, however, the practicals "appear"
to be unworkable?! It would allow for each transaction to be controlled
by free market principles, but we'd have to utilize silver grams also &
have a set ratio between silver & gold, because if one fluctuates greater
than the other the "value" would vary. People still don't want to
carry the weight around! So how can we have a paper backed
by grams or ounces? It would have to be 101% counterfeit proof and
even the lowliest farmer would have to have "verification devices."
(ie: ultraviolet lights) Let's have more discussion on this topic.
![]() continued at the top of Page 2
|
3. Why do you think they take a census
each 10 years? To find out what kind of toilet their property
is using!
4. Why don't you send all "Occupant & Resident" mail back to the P.O. as not being on your list? 5. Don't you remember the statement Janet Reno made when Idaho's A/G issued an indictment for murder against Lon Horiuchi? "Sorry, we are not going to "give him up," as the US does not have an extradition treaty with Idaho!!" ![]() Eric; Tehachapi, California
![]() 1. There wouldn't be a problem determining the value of a dozen eggs. It wouldn't be necessary to have a computer. The value would be whatever the merchant could get for them. Your concern with fluctuating prices results from dealing in an economy based on currency, the value of which is unstable and under the control of governments. The value of real money is very stable and NOT under the control of governments. That merchant would probably not have to change the price of his eggs once in a decade if that often if the economy used real money. And what difference does it make if the values of gold and silver change relative to one another? The coins shouldn't show the value. They should show content. Finally, people don't need to carry a lot of weight in silver. They can carry a little weight in gold. 2. I agree that there isn't a legitimate county jurisdiction unless the marriage is licensed by the county. However, counties are not presently legitimate governments. They are despotisms. The lack of a license doesn't prevent them from exercising illegitimate powers. You can prove it for yourself by trying to defy the county. Agents of the "family services" gestapo will take the children, license or no license. Finally, I'm not aware of any such agent who has ever been sued, much less punished, for such tyranny. editor
![]() Dear Sam - ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Elliot; N. Merrick, New York
![]() 1. I explained in my article why the total value of the gold in the world needs to be only a small fraction of the value of the transactions to be conducted in gold. Besides that, what difference does it make if the value of gold is "astronomical", to use your word? That just means that a little gold will buy a lot of stuff. You can use silver and copper for small purchases. Also, I didn't advocate the imposition of a planetary gold standard. I don't think governments should produce money at all. I think that anybody who has metal should be able to coin money, or have it coined at a private mint. Governments might be useful for purposes of assay. Finally, currency is a stupid idea and planetary currency is even more stupid. Currency isn't money. Since it has no intrinsic value, its "value" is entirely under the control of the governments and their lackeys, the banks. 2. Yes, it's natural for children to have different rights than adults. More generally, it's natural for some people to have different rights than others. ![]() continued at the top of Page 3
|
3. The UN wasn't supposed to have jurisdiction
over the behavior of people or over internal matters of nations, but only
over matters of international relations between nations. The claims
of genocide are an excuse to extend the jurisdiction of the UN to subject
matter that was originally excluded from its jurisdiction by its charter.
Furthermore, the charges of genocide are phoney. Genocide hasn't
occurred until an entire population has been completely exterminated.
Just as you cannot charge someone with murder if the victim survives, so
you cannot charge people with genocide if some of the target population
survives. You can, at most, charge them with attempted genocide,
which isn't the same thing, and which the World Court is failing to do.
editor
![]() To: "Editor, Frontiersman" Re: October 1998 Frontiersman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() James; Sacramento, California
![]() 1. I don't advocate phoney ID. It's merely another way to comply with ID requirements. You don't oppose the ID system by complying with it, dishonestly or otherwise, but by refusing to comply. 2. I agree that many institutions help the government control people. The system of surveillance and control has grown bit by bit. The problem is that no single bit ever seemed important enough to be worth opposing. It was always easier to just fill out the form. Yet, you see the result. The USPS bit is worth opposing. Each and every bit must be opposed or we lose our liberty. editor
|
Buck Hunter Shoots Off His Mouth Dear Buck ![]() Suspicious
![]() Dear Suspicious ![]() Acknowledgments
editor
![]() COMPRESS was something you did to the garbage Not something you did to a FILE And if you UNZIPPED anything in public You'd be in jail for a while? Frontiersman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Sam Aurelius Milam III, editor
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Readers
![]() ![]() Sincerely, Sam Aurelius Milam III
|
|
|