|
|
|
I
leaped off of the motorcycle and yanked it over to the shoulder.
I didn't pull it or drag it. I yanked it. There was just the
one quick yank, and me and the motorcycle were on the asphalt shoulder.
In the fast lane, traffic resumed. When I yanked the motorcycle out
of the fast lane, I was just barely at the beginning of the tunnel under
Interstate 280/680. In front of me was a long stretch of asphalt,
about five or six feet wide. To my left were the concrete barriers.
To my right was the fast lane. I didn't think about what to do.
I didn't think at all. That part of my mind was turned off.
I was in a kind of zombie condition. What I did, without giving the
matter any thought at all, was to push the motorcycle through the tunnel,
a hundred yards or more, I suppose, to the other end of the interstate
overpass. It isn't easy to push a motorcycle on asphalt, with it's
rear wheel locked. It might be possible but, even with a Honda 175,
it isn't easy. I did it without any noticeable effort at all.
I didn't strain. I didn't breathe hard or even sweat. After
that, when I hear a report of unusual strength in an emergency, I believe
it.
I pushed the motorcycle out of the far end of the tunnel and to the left, onto the grass. I still wasn't thinking. I was just doing mindless things. Maybe they could be called reflexes. I don't know. Anyway, I climbed onto the motorcycle, sat there, and worked the controls. They didn't mean anything to me. I pushed buttons, clicked the gear shifter, and pulled the levers on the handlebars. I twisted the throttle. Sometimes, a green light on the instrument cluster turned on. Sometimes it went off. Sometimes the horn honked, but I didn't know why. It was all meaningless to me. After a while, I got back off of the motorcycle, put down the side stand, backed up a few steps, and looked at the motorcycle. I saw the problem. The steel bicycle cable that I used to lock the motorcycle when it was parked, and that I carried coiled on the luggage rack, had slipped backward. A loop of it had fallen down, snagged the circumference of the rear wheel, and snapped tight between the wheel and the luggage rack. It had stopped the wheel from turning. In the instant that I saw that length of cable, stretched tightly between the luggage rack and the wheel, there was an inaudible snap inside of my head, and I could think again. I unhooked the bicycle cable, secured it to the luggage rack, and drove home. I still have that bicycle cable. It still has bent places, and tears in the plastic cover, where it snagged on the wheel and stretched down from the luggage rack. For now, I'm using it to lock a lawn mower, to keep a certain annoying neighbor from "borrowing" it. Sometimes, as I walk past that lawn mower, I stop, look down at the bicycle cable, and wonder. Letters to the Editor Hey Sam, Quick update, I'm back in the max in my own private room, and because of the virus, the whole prison is still on quarantine lockdown video visits only! But on the early morning of January 5th a few rooms past me, the guards found a dead black guy who had hung himself with a twisted bed sheet. He had been dead for several hours. The guards aren't doing the proper 30-minute security checks and the ADC is keeping this suicide hush hush from the news media, but most of the time we don't see any guards from one meal to the next. And being locked inside of an isolation cell with another inmate is very dangerous! I'm doing everything I can to stay in the max in my own private room away from the virus and other inmates! —Howie in the Max
Dear Sam, Hey yo, what up. All is well I pray. Your first article in your Jan 2021 Frontiersman [What I Didn't Say to Miss Andry] immediately caught my eye. Many women have done the same to me, they said my statements were chauvinistic and regardless of what they use as their battle cry. I call bullshit. No woman can ever hold up to and be as strong as a man. Certain jobs, like police officer, fireman, soldier, etc., these jobs require a certain amount of aggression and strength that women can't muster up. Instead they do two things, one, they act overly aggressive, to prove how tough they are. This is a real problem in male dominated fields like law enforcement. So they commonly abuse peoples' civil rights. Second, they put their male counterparts in danger because men have to allow for special accommodations to allow the women to participate or they (men) have to outright put themselves in danger to cover for the women's shortcomings. But Sam it isn't just the feminists doing this to men. I have found if you're a white man there are a ton of "anti" statements that we are blamed for, and we can't respond. A black can hold a sign saying "Black Lives Matter" and they're applauded, but if we say our lives matter, we're called racist. Look at all situations, like gays, transsexuals, race, women, opposing religions whatever, and then think about a "cute" statement you could make, and it's usually a white man
|
who loses if he opens his mouth.
So, in your "Stray Thoughts", your comment "when the toleration of diversity becomes mandatory, then that requirement is itself a form of intolerance." Boy does this ring true. And white men are at the bottom of the pole. Everyone can make opinions of us and it's OK but if we comment, we're the bad guys. Next as to your "Real Bears" article red bears blue bears company, I'd be willing to bet if you researched it both companies are owned under a C corp. umbrella. They're simply creating their own competition, and your money goes to the same board of members. Disney (as in Walt), is a good example. They own so much including many news organizations and they aren't unbiased. When a company tries to control the spread of information they become the "Big Brother" in Orwell's "1984". Disney owns "Fox" and "CW" TV stations, and all political commentary shows shown on Fox. I feel the top 10 corporations have become the real deep state, and the governments of the world are nothing more than their "strong arms". That's why where you put someone like Trump in charge you're begging for trouble. That's like asking the mice in your house to guard your cheese. And there's no answer to this problem. Greed will always win. There is a "grand canyon" between the rich and poor man. Money equals power, power means control, and the rich are so good at getting people to fight, right against the left, that the "poor" don't ever realize the "rich" are fucking them in the ass. The only thing that will stop the "rich's" pursuit in my opinion will be technology. Corporations are so gung ho on increasing profit, that A.I. (artificial intelligence) is coming around by leaps and bounds. Corporations are intent on replacing all work with artificial labor. I feel eventually machines will get the ability to truly "think" and the sci fi movies of horror will become reality. You and I have spoken briefly on this, but the Moon for example may be a relic of one of our previous civilizations. We ruined the Earth before, and built the Moon as a terraforming machine to heal the Earth. And our previous ancestors went into deep space. Maybe they're our ancestral gods we so blindly follow now. Maybe they came back when the Earth healed and injected us into Earth as an experiment. They injected different dogmas into different races and we're now an experiment. Who knows? Anyway, Sam, be safe and well. —S.H., a prisoner
Elusive Civility
Sam Aurelius Milam III I can accept the idea that we might have an obligation to tolerate all different kinds of people, but that doesn't mean that we also have an obligation to like any of them. Our freedom to have our own opinions about other people is far more important than are the demands of the activists, who insist that we must approve of their ugly new secular orthodoxy, political correctness. Indeed, the more unorthodox, unpopular, or radical somebody's opinion happens to be, then the more important it is that his freedom to hold that opinion must be respected. It might occasionally be appropriate to punish someone for his behavior, always keeping in mind the principles of liberty, but it's never appropriate to punish somebody merely because of his opinions. Hate crimes are a good example. They punish a man for his crime and then punish him additionally for his belief. If we're permitted to have only approved opinions, then there isn't any freedom of opinion. Instead, all opinions will be subject to review and approval by the most powerful faction of the moment. That power to declare which opinions are approved, and which opinions are disapproved, and to punish people who have the wrong opinions, becomes, itself, a form of intolerance. The tyranny of good is just as fatal to liberty as is the tyranny of evil, and the enforcement of mandatory good behavior is a step in the wrong direction. From such sanctimonious arrogance did the Witch Hunts and the Inquisition arise. The enforcement of approved opinions, today, and the condemnation of people who hold disapproved opinions, is an ugly step in the direction of just such ghastly situations as those. Maybe, some day, people will learn a better way to deal with intolerance. Maybe they'll figure out something that's less hypocritical, less punitive, and more enlightened, than merely to be intolerant of somebody else's version of intolerance. A New Funding Plan
|
Acknowledgments My thanks to the following: El Dorado Bob; Betty; Ramon, of Soledad, California; Robert, of Lee's Summit, Missouri; and Joseph, of Northridge, California. — editor
Websites http://frontiersman.org.uk/ http://moonlight-flea-market.com/ http://pharos.org.uk/ http://sam-aurelius-milam-iii.org.uk/ http://sovereign-library.org.uk/ Ethnic Jokes (They're jokes. Just laugh.)
Frontiersman Availability — Assuming the availability of sufficient funds, subscriptions to this newsletter in print, copies of past issues in print, and copies of the website on CDs are available upon request. Funding for this newsletter is from sources over which I don't have any control, so it might become necessary for me to terminate these offers or to cancel one or more subscriptions at any time, without notice. All past issues are presently available for free download at the internet address shown below. Contributions are welcome. Cancellations — If you don't want to keep receiving printed copies of this newsletter, then return your copy unopened. When I receive it, I'll terminate your subscription. Reprint Policy — Permission is hereby given to reproduce this newsletter in its entirety or to reproduce material from it, provided that the reproduction is accurate and that proper credit is given. I do not have the authority to give permission to reprint material that I have reprinted from other sources. For that permission, you must apply to the original source. I would appreciate receiving a courtesy copy of any document or publication in which you reprint my material. Submissions — I consider letters, articles, and cartoons for the newsletter, but I don't pay for them. Short items are more likely to be printed. I suggest that letters and articles be shorter than 500 words but that's flexible depending on space available and the content of the piece. Payment — This newsletter isn't for sale. If you want to make a voluntary contribution, then I prefer cash or U.S. postage stamps. For checks or money orders, please inquire. You can use editor@frontiersman.org.uk for PayPal payments. In case anybody's curious, I also accept gold, silver, platinum, etc. I don't accept anything that requires me to provide ID to receive it. — Sam Aurelius Milam III, editor
|
|
|