Letters
to the Editor
Greetings Sam,
I
have just a little time that can be made to comment on the Nov. Frontiersman.
As always, it was a worthwhile & even useful read, tho most of my comments
here (if not all) will be essentially an attack on certain points presented.
1.
As you have a number of times before and I am surprised each time, you
stated in your lead (Paperclip)
article that administrators of Nazi prisons were experts in the efficient
extermination of humans, and ... disposal of human remains and that there
were "death camps," "in Germany." As much as always, I admire your
genius mind & insights, Sam, & your ability likewise to articulate
them and much other wisdom you have to impart. It's especially
for that reason that it troubles me that you still parrot these ridiculous,
preposterous
claims about the Germans & Nazis in WW II. All that lying propaganda
from Satan's children who instigated WW II (and it certainly wasn't the
Germans, who sought peace over & over), and all the disgusting nonsense
about "death camps" and "gassing Jews," and all the other related lying
nonsense has been eruditely proven conclusively over & over
to have been all false by every applicable form of empirical and flawless
scientific evidence. This is a bigger hoax than 911 which you are
on the correct side of (of the debate), so what keeps blocking your understanding
on this even more important matter? For the most
reliable
evidence on earth about this debunking, start with The Barnes Review (google
it, or TBR Box 15877, Wash, DC 20003, tele 877.773.9077). A
second excellent source is The Institute for Historical Review, which I
believe is still in Torrence, CA. Check a few of their scores (or
hundreds?) of scientifically sound books on the subject. I think
this is the only subject in modern times, at least in the "civilized" countries
that mete years in brutal prisons as punishment for merely disagreeing
with the proven lies of this aspect of WW II. That alone should
tell you a lot, beginning with who would need to go to such alarming
lengths to keep a cover-up of facts in place? And why?
2.
Same lead article you fairly acknowledge that you can't prove your speculation
about there being a 3rd group of German experts recruited into the U.S.A.
by US gov for nefarious purposes & that's all fine, you may be right
tho it's still speculation. Yet 2 paragraphs later you state, "Regarding
the third group of recruits..." as tho it's an established fact, tho
you later qualify it as "hypothetical." I think it leaves
you a target, too much so, of a credibility attack by this rather smooth
slide from "no verification" to "the...recruits."
3.
The Christian-bashing by Sir D the E: The problem with this whole
mess of an article (letter) is Don takes a doctrine which is not biblical,
but which misguided or malicious mere men have twisted & positioned
as tho it were Biblical (Christian) that is the doctrine of burning in
hell for eternity, & builds his article around & on the foundation
of this falsehood. If Don would start with the true Biblical foundation
on the subject, that such hellfire passages are symbolic/allegorical, then
all the rest of the bashing he does wouldn't even be able to be given truth,
along with his rash & dangerous "conclusion" that God of the Christians
is a cosmic sadist.
You
did exactly the same thing in your Almighty,
Alrighty article. Starts with a false premise as to what the
Bible says & means on the subject (it doesn't say any such thing about
God frying us all in hell in a literal sense, at least). Everything
else in your article similarly starts with a false premise of what the
Bible supposedly says, when in fact it's misguided and foolish mere men's
doctrine that you cite, masquerading as Biblical writ.
4.
BTW, backing up to Sir D the E's letter: There are very good books
(few) that astoundingly reveal with what appears to be completely sound
evidence, that before Noah's flood 3 or 4,000 BC, that that antediluvian
world had more advanced technology than we have today in most everything,
including
nuclear weapons, that were used....
5.
Great quote by Thomas Sowell a truth near & dear to my heart.
He "must have been there" too.
6.
Great "Laugh medicine" in the laughs section.
a prisoner
Regarding
the Jews, I suggest my two articles Holocaust?
(October 1996, page 2) and Dawn
of Darkness (March 2009, page 2).
Regarding
the Christians, you seem to be claiming that they're all in violation
of the "true Biblical foundation", to use your words. So, it appears
to me that your own comments
Page 2 |
Frontiersman,0c/o
4984 Peach Mountain Drive, Gainesville, Georgia 30507
http://frontiersman.org.uk/ |
December 2014 |
|