Lay Their
Burden Down
Sam Aurelius Milam III
 Over
the years, various women have told me their stories of the "molestation"
that they experienced during their adolescence. After a while, I
noticed that there's an unexpected common element in some of the stories.
That is, several of the women reported to me that they'd continued to return
to their "molesters", knowing that the "molestation" would continue.
While circumstances might sometimes force a young woman to do that against
her will, it wasn't clear to me listening to their stories, that such was
always the case. I had the impression that, in at least some of the
cases, they returned because they wanted to. The anti-sin activists
will viciously attack anybody who dares to suggest such a thing.
They insist that all sexual relationships involving adolescent females
are molestation, that all such relationships result from coercion or manipulation
by men, and that all adolescent female participants in such relationships
are victims. Nevertheless, some of the stories that I heard suggested
otherwise.
One
particular woman, after several years of telling me about her "molestation",
confided in me a statement that had been made to her by her "molester".
He had said, after their first encounter, "Well, since you enjoyed that
so much, we'll do it again." It occurred to me then that she might
not have been a victim of molestation, but of guilt. Maybe she wasn't
tormented by what had happened to her when she was an adolescent.
Maybe she was tormented by the fact that she'd enjoyed it so much, even
though it had been presented to her as obscene. Maybe her recollection
of the experience as "molestation" was an act of self-deception, intended
to rid her of guilt. If so, then it didn't work.
Such
a sexual relationship might indeed be molestation, as the anti-sin activists
define it. In that case, I sympathize with the victim. On the
other hand, the evaluation of such relationships isn't necessarily as cut-and-dried
as the anti-sin activists want us to believe. Those activists have
an agenda and I believe that they evaluate such relationships to suit themselves,
regardless of the facts. They view every sexual relationship that
involves an adolescent female as being molestation. They insist that
every adolescent female in such a relationship is a victim. Those
allegations are true some of the time, but not necessarily all of the time.
I suggest that the harm to young women that's attributed to "molestation"
might not always be caused by the "molestation". Maybe, at least
some of the time, it might be caused by the doctrines of sin, guilt, and
obscenity that the anti-sin activists have inflicted upon all of us.
Maybe, if young women weren't already programmed in advance to believe
that their bodies and their desires are obscene, and that sex is a sin,
then the results might be different.
To
whatever extent my speculations are correct, I place the blame for the
harm to young woman entirely on the self-righteous anti-sin activists.
They've inflicted their ugly doctrines onto all of us, whether or not we
agree with them. They use every means at their disposal, including
the punitive powers of government, to ruin the lives of anybody who dares
to disagree with them. They succeed only because we submit.
If we will rid ourselves of their corrupting influence, then we might see
things differently. We might relieve ourselves of a lot of needless
guilt and punishment. Sin is their burden, not ours. We should
reject it as forcefully as they have imposed it. We should lay their
burden down. 
High Hopes
Sam Aurelius Milam III
I've
noticed, over the years, that the blacks will get up in arms because a
cop killed or attacked a black man. I don't recall seeing the blacks
get similarly upset when a cop killed or attacked a white man. That
suggests to me that the blacks don't care if the cops kill or attack white
people, only if they kill or attack black people. It makes me wonder.
Is it possible that maybe the blacks might be just as racist as the whites?
What's
wrong with everybody? What difference does it make if the victim
was white or black? What matters is that the cops killed somebody.
I don't know if the blacks are more clueless, failing to understand that,
or if the whites are more clueless, failing to notice. Both whites
and blacks ought to object when the cops kill somebody, of any race.
Actually,
there might be a bright side to this. If we can achieve equality
of cluelessness, then maybe we can go even further. Today, equality
of cluelessness. Tomorrow, who knows?
| June 2015 |
Frontiersman,0c/o
4984 Peach Mountain Drive, Gainesville, Georgia 30507
http://frontiersman.org.uk/ |
Page
3 |
|
