|
|
|
Please use the enclosed envelope to send
a contribution. I prefer cash. For checks or money orders,
please inquire.
|
Gone
But Not Forgotten
Sam Aurelius Milam III In October, I watched the Fort Knox episode of Brad Meltzer's Decoded. The documentary included a lot of important information. Some of the positions that I've taken over the years with regard to money, finance, and the political significance of such things were supported by information that was provided in the documentary. However, the most important information didn't address money, banking, or finance. It addressed an entirely different subject. That information was part of an interview of Craig Hulet, a foreign policy analyst, Vietnam veteran, and former Senior Armorer for the troops that guard Fort Knox. The interview was conducted by Buddy Levy (a professor), Scott Rolle (an attorney), and Christine McKinley (an engineer). They're the regular investigators for the program. Here's the transcript of that interview.
The agenda of the documentary was to investigate the possibility that there isn't any gold in Fort Knox. During the course of that investigation, a situation of much greater signifi- For PayPal payments, use Frontiersman@manlymail.net.
|
cance came to light. That situation is
the open admission by a former Fort Knox guard, on national television,
that the authorities at Fort Knox will cause intruders to disappear.
The alleged justification for such behavior is pretty much irrelevant.
A government should never make people disappear.
The sinister policy at Fort Knox isn't unique within the U.S. government. I noted in my essay Unnamed Agency that the U.S. government disposes of people who get in its way. In that essay, I claimed the existence of an established, nationwide system of disposal camps, in which such people are executed and cremated. Unnamed Agency is a credible essay without the necessity of any additional corroboration but the Fort Knox episode of Brad Meltzer's Decoded is the first time that I've ever seen my claims actually confirmed on national television. Craig Hulet came right out in the open and declared that the government will make somebody disappear. He didn't claim that an intruder would be arrested, jailed, and given a trial. He didn't make any reference to due process. He didn't mention reading somebody his rights. He said that the authorities would make the intruder disappear. The documentary was excellent. Its only disappointing aspect was that the producers didn't acknowledge the significance of the policy about the U.S. government that they discovered. Instead, they ignored it. Whether or not it was a part of the original agenda of the documentary, making people disappear is a lot more important than making gold disappear. I believe that the producers ought to have further investigated that aspect of the situation. I believe that they still should. Maybe the next season of Brad Meltzer's Decoded will include an episode with just such an investigation if, of course, Brad Meltzer doesn't disappear first. I can only hope. Letter to the Editor Sam, Greetings! Sam, I want to share something with you in hopes that you may understand what transpired in my delay in writing to you back! But as you know Sam we live in a world that no one has any rights whatsoever!!! A world where if you go against the grain, you either shut up and take it or you fight for what is right and hold your ground! I sat in my cell one day looking at that essay concerning 9/11 [Unnamed Agency —editor] and I came to realize that it wasn't complete! I remember in a letter you wrote to me, to let you know if anything was amiss! So I did! And lo and behold I was arrested early in the morning, nine of them took me to the program office and told me I was going to the hole because I threaten to kill the president! "I'm like, you got to be kidding! and was I a political prisoner?" I was like law suite! :) I came to realize Sam that something is amiss in 9/11 and no one wants to truth to come out! Innocent people were murdered and I feel further study into this may yield more truth! Like in your November 2011 newsletter [The Principles of Liberty, —editor], Sam the united states has to prove they had nothing to do with 9/11, instead of falsely accusing inmates of trying to murder the president! Not counting the fact that the secret service came and see me asking all kinds of questions! Our tax payer dollars should not be wasted on fruitless investigations! These type of actions show us that the tree of liberty isn't growing but is being dried up by these tyrants! In closing Sam, you did an outstanding job on November 2011 newsletter! Keep up the good work, friend! Sincerely, —name withheld
I'm planning a revision to the 911 essay. Since I didn't receive your previous letter, I don't know what you intended to suggest regarding that essay. It sounds like you should keep it to yourself until you can discover a more nearly secure way to send the information. Did they take your copy of the essay? By the way, I was visited by FBI agents, in May of 2006, prior to writing the essay, while I was engaged in some research about the Boeing airplanes. —editor
Pet Peeve Sam Aurelius Milam III I occasionally see pet supply ads that are more than normally stupid. The ads refer to people who have pets as "pet parents". I can tell you for a fact that unless the mongrel came out of that woman's birth canal, then she isn't a "pet parent". She's a pet owner, and I use even that term with reservations. See Right Treatment, on page 1 of the May 2011 issue. Anyway, the mutt isn't a member of the family. The mutt is a dog. Let's have some respect for the idea of family as a human institution. For PayPal payments, use Frontiersman@manlymail.net.
|
Acknowledgments My thanks to the following: SantaClara Bob; Lady Jan the Voluptuous; my mother; Dewey and Betty; and Eric, of Ione, California. — editor
Rules of the Workplace Original Source Unknown. Forwarded by David, of Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Interesting Facts Original Source Unknown. Forwarded by Steve, of Mililani, Hawaii. I didn't try to verify any of them.
Frontiersman Subscriptions and Past Issues — Printed copies of this newsletter, either subscriptions or past issues, are available by application only. Cancellations — If you don't want to keep receiving this newsletter, then return it unopened. When I receive it, I'll terminate your subscription. Reprint Policy — Permission is hereby granted to reproduce this newsletter in its entirety or to reproduce material from it, provided that the reproduction is accurate and that proper credit is given. I do not have the authority to give permission to reprint material that I have reprinted from other sources. For that permission, you must go to the original source. I would appreciate receiving a courtesy copy of any document or publication in which you reprint my material. Submissions — I solicit letters, articles, and cartoons for the newsletter, but I don't pay for them. Short items are more likely to be printed. I suggest that letters and articles be shorter than 500 words but that's flexible depending on space available and the content of the piece. Payment — This newsletter isn't for sale. If you want to make a voluntary contribution, then I prefer cash or U.S. postage stamps. For checks or money orders, please inquire. For PayPal payments, use Frontiersman@manlymail.net. The continued existence of the newsletter will depend, in part, on such contributions. I don't accept anything that requires me to provide ID to receive it. In case anybody's curious, I also accept gold, silver, platinum, etc. — Sam Aurelius Milam III, editor
For PayPal payments, use Frontiersman@manlymail.net.
|
|
|