Caveat LectorSam Aurelius Milam III
I’ve been publishing this newsletter for more than 32 years.
The newsletter isn’t even my first attempt to present what I believe to be the truth. Originally, I wrote letters to politicians, corporate executives, and various institutions. I learned some things but, otherwise, I didn’t accomplish any changes or improvements. Later, I wrote essays. The essays went largely unnoticed. This newsletter has also been largely ineffective. In the October 2019 issue,
I replied to a reader who, responding to my frustration, suggested that
I should get a radio talk show, and reach millions. I replied that
the Nazarene had already reached millions, and look at the sorry results.
For centuries, his so-called followers have been indistinguishable from all of the other bloodthirsty thugs and zealots, shunning, ostracizing,
oppressing, torturing, maiming, or killing one another in the name of one
alleged god or another. Reaching millions has been done before and,
the more that I learn, the more it seems like a bad idea.

I’ve often been troubled by the negative tenor of my writing, but that’s the nature of the beast. A bridge that’s in good condition isn’t a problem. A rotted or defective bridge is a problem.
I’ve tried to reveal problems. I have, maybe with a certain pretentious arrogance, claimed to be facing the truth, however great the cost.
Maybe I should have been more careful in the claims that I’ve made because I’ve painted myself into a corner. I’ve been claiming to face the
truth, however great the cost but now, my own claims compel me to actually
do so. There’s truth that I’d prefer not to face. Here are
some unpleasant but true things to consider.
•

We've engaged in an uncontrolled population explosion that has exceeded the capacity of our planet to sustain us. In the documentary
8 Billion Angels, Jane Goodall quoted Mahatma Gandhi as saying, "This planet can provide for human need, but not for human greed."
I believe that our greed has initiated an extinction event and that there isn't any reason to believe that we're exempt from it. I
fear that we’re facing extinction, a truth that I’d prefer to not face.
•

We've created a non-biological life form, corporations, that I call overcreatures. See
Procreation, in the April 2008 issue.
Overcreatures don’t have any interest whatsoever in our well-being, beyond our ability to serve their needs. If they find better servants than us, then we'll become expendable. With that in mind, consider that they’re developing a technology of robotics that will serve them far better than we can, and an infrastructure of autonomous robots that will surely be weaponized, which they will control, and against which we will be defenseless. It's easy to connect those dots. It’s another truth that I’d prefer to not face.
•

We're developing an AI technology that we don't understand,
that we won't be able to control, and that might not have any interest
in us at all. Even if it doesn't intentionally eliminate us, it could just absentmindedly displace by using up our space, making us the next victims of habitat loss. It’s yet another truth that I’m loath to face.

Those truths are hard to face but next comes the really hard part. I think that, maybe, we might have been able to survive one or another of the three situations that I summarized above, by itself, but not
all of them at the same time. Taken together, they’re a triple whammy
that, I believe, we can’t survive. It seems likely that our society,
our technology, and our population, will all crash. If that happens,
then I expect that our condition will fall right past that of hunter-gatherer, without even slowing down, all the way to the status of scavengers.
We’ve so degraded our planetary environment, and so squandered and depleted our resources that, even if there are any survivors who are competent to
subsist as hunter-gatherers, then they probably won’t be able to find much
to hunt or to gather. Instead, they’ll have to subsist on bugs and
berries. If they live long enough to have descendants, then it will
take those descendents thousands of years to reconstruct organized societies.
It seems more likely to me that, having dropped into the situation, rather
than having evolved into it, they won’t make any progress at all.
It seems more likely that they’ll slowly devolve into some sort of neo-chimpanzees.

There’s an alternative to the slide back into the darkness of sub-sapience. That alternative is extinction. I don’t know how many times I’ve found that scenario presented in works of fiction,
and elsewhere, throughout the decades but, in my opinion, the best
portrayal of it was given by Nevil Shute, in
On the Beach.
His novel was powerful but I believe that the movie is more effective.
In the movie, they got it exactly right, all the way to the tragically false
declaration of hope that was displayed on the banner in the final scene
of the movie “There is Still Time .. Brother”.